Editorial policy

We log what public figures have said about their own longevity routines. We don’t log what we think they do, what they ought to do, or what you should do.

Primary sources only

Every item on a routine page links to a primary source: the person’s own website, a book they wrote (with chapter or page), a podcast or video episode they appear in (with a timestamp), their official newsletter, or their own social media posts. We don’t use other people’s summaries, fan wikis, forum posts or “X reportedly takes” articles as sources.

Every claim is dated

Routines change. Each item shows when the person stated it and links the dated source. Each page shows the date it was last checked against its sources. When someone says they stopped or changed something, we record it in the page’s “Changelog” rather than silently overwriting it.

Gaps stay gaps

If a person hasn’t publicly stated a dose, a brand, a time of day or a whole category (for example, their sleep routine), the page says “not publicly stated”. We never fill gaps with guesses, typical doses or inferences. Doses appear only exactly as stated.

No medical advice

This is reporting, not health advice. We don’t say whether anything works, is safe or is right for you, and we avoid “you should” language. Talk to a qualified clinician before changing your diet, supplements, sleep or exercise.

No implied endorsement

The people we profile have not reviewed or endorsed this site, and we don’t suggest otherwise. Reporting that someone has said they use a product isn’t an endorsement of that product by them or by us. A product link marked exact goes to the product they named; one marked similar is an alternative we chose. See our affiliate disclosure.

Fact-checking

Before a page is published, a reviewer opens every cited source and confirms the quote, dose and date match. Nothing goes live with an uncited claim. Our build system also refuses to publish a page if any item lacks a source, cites a source that isn’t listed, or if the page has fewer than eight sourced, specific items. Published pages are re-checked on a rolling schedule, oldest first.

AI assistance and human oversight

The Longevity Log is operated with AI assistance. AI tools help find sources, extract quotes, draft pages and check links. A human reviews and approves what is published and is responsible for it. AI is never treated as a source: every claim must trace to a primary source a reviewer has opened.

Corrections

If we get something wrong or a routine is out of date, we fix it, update the “last verified” date and record the change in our public corrections log. We especially welcome corrections from the people we profile or their teams.